Announcement

Conference: Fundamentalism and the Future

September 11–12, 2009
California Institute of Integral Studies
San Francisco, CA

NEW: Listen to Audio Recordings of the Conference

 
Introduction arrow Fundamentalism arrow An Outbreak of Fundamentalism?
An Outbreak of Fundamentalism? Print E-mail
Article Index
An Outbreak of Fundamentalism?
Rejection of complexity
Demand for doctrinal purity
Feelings of being threatened
Control of information
Exclusivism
Opposition to discussion
Abusive language
Rousing the masses
Atmosphere of violence
Demonizing the enemy
Heroic role in a cosmic drama
Conclusions

9. Creating an atmosphere of violence

Mass movements often end in violence. The anti-Heehs movement has not reached this point, though it is clear that the leaders have pushed the masses in this direction. Several members on the SAICE forum, incited by Ananda Reddy and others, have posted threats against Heehs. Others have threatened him over the telephone. There have also been small but significant acts of violence: Heehs’s bicycle tire was slashed while he was in the swimming pool, and his door was kicked in by a mentally unstable person. This person is known to have been enflamed by literature provided by Ranade’s mother.

Those who create such an atmosphere often claim that they never directly incited or encouraged violence. But in this case, the leaders bear direct responsibility, when they repeatedly characterize Heehs as “demonic,” as an “asura,” “cunning,” “stealthy,” speaking of “real danger,” and then engage in repeated calls for “action.” When a highly emotional campaign is waged against a single person, using religious and absolutist language, and rousing hundreds of people against him, physical violence is a natural outcome.


 
< Prev   Next >